| Year | Ener.co Revenue | Participant Payout | Participant Cumulative | Ener.co Net | Ener.co Profit | Ener.co Cumulative |
|---|
| Projects | Tonnage | Year 1 ARR | Contract Revenue | Client Value | Total Value Created |
|---|
Ener.co has 13 years of longitudinal coating persistence data across 76+ commercial HVAC projects spanning data centers, telecom facilities, printing plants, and commercial offices. Seven projects carry independent third-party validation from NYSERDA, utility rebate programs, and licensed engineers. No competitor has this depth of field evidence. Explore the full M&V Library →
| Deployment | Tonnage | Monitoring | Key Result | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major NYC printing facility — 29 AHU fleet | 3,475 T | 10 years (2015–2026) | 18% energy reduction, 9-year persistence confirmed | NYSERDA TRC Verified |
| Northeast data center — 9 CRAC units | 270 T | 2024–2025 | 19.6% EER improvement (fleet average) | PSEG Utility Rebate |
| Major telecom DC campus — 9 ACCU fleet | 180 T | 2023, 3-period M&V design | 32.3% kW reduction, 53.7% EER improvement | PE CMVP Report |
| Major telecom chiller plant — 2× 100T chillers | 200 T | 2023, 3-period M&V design | 14.2% kW/ton improvement (pure Enercoat attribution) | Independent BSME |
| Major telecom pilot site — humidity-normalized study | 135 T | 2023 | 12.3% EER improvement (Method B, humidity-corrected) | PE CMVP + Reanalysis |
| Northeast data center (legacy) — single CRAC | 20 T | 10 years (2016–2026) | 8.4% EER (conservative reanalysis of original report) | Internal M&V |
| Major telecom pilot — 3.5-year persistence retest | 70 T | 2018 + 2021 persistence | 19.8% EER improvement, persistence maintained at 3.5 years | PE CMVP Report |
IPMVP Option B (Retrofit Isolation): Each project measures kW and environmental conditions (temperature, humidity) at the unit level before and after treatment. EER (Energy Efficiency Ratio) is computed per ASHRAE methodology using psychrometric properties of moist air, with elevation correction for local barometric pressure.
Humidity normalization: Cross-season comparisons require normalizing for latent load differences. The analysis engine bins readings by outdoor air temperature and humidity ratio, then compares overlapping bins between baseline and post-treatment periods. This eliminates weather as a confound.
3-period M&V design: Baseline → PM cleaning (control) → Enercoat application. The PM period isolates the cleaning effect from the coating effect. Projects where PM shows zero improvement (e.g., Lancaster chiller plant) provide the cleanest attribution evidence.
Degradation model: 3.0% annual uncoated degradation based on NREL/DOE Building America field studies and FSEC Parker et al. (2018). 0.25% treated degradation based on Ener.co's longitudinal field data. The widening gap compounds over the contract term — gains increase each year.
Data tiers: Tier 1 (live sensor + raw CSV, full audit trail), Tier 2 (raw CSV, analysis engine pipeline), Tier 3 (summary + vendor data, verified), Tier 4 (anecdotal). Only Tier 1–3 projects appear in the evidence table above.